Showing posts with label abuse. Show all posts
Showing posts with label abuse. Show all posts

Sunday, August 18, 2024

Tim Keller on the prison of unforgiveness

 From Tim Keller's book, Forgive (pp13-14):

When I was a young pastor in a small town in Virginia, I came upon two people almost the same week who were locked in their own prisons of non-forgiveness. It was June and we were sponsoring a "vacation Bible school." We knocked on all the doors in the surrounding neighborhood to invite the residents to send their children for the week. One young father at the door was initially polite and said, "No, thank you." However, when I offered to come by and pick his sons up, he answered with some heat, "My father forced us to go to church. He forced religion down our throats. I will never, ever let my sons darken the door aof any church!" I'm pretty sure he then mumbled something about how unhappy he was that there was even a church so near his house. There was nothing more to say, but it was clear that, because he was still so angry at his father, both he and his parenting were still being directed and controlled by his father.

Not long afterward I had a long talk with a teenage girl who was a member of my church. She too had an overbearing and difficult father, and he had embarrassed her in front of her friends. She told me that she refused to ever forgive him for that. My counterpoint went something like this: "Yes, he did you wrong, but if you don't forgive him the way Jesus forgave you, you will actually give him power over you. You will do things not because they are the best things to do but because in your heart you know your father wouldn't like them. You will not do other things because you know your father would like them. I've seen this happen with other kids. I don't want it to happen to you." To my surprise, it made perfect sense to her. "I never thought of it like that," she said. 

Tuesday, September 03, 2013

What are you enslaved to, Mr Rudd?

I was appalled when I heard the brief response of our Prime Minister, Kevin Rudd, to a Christian Pastor on ABC's Q&A last night. The snippet is on YouTube here:



I don't want to have disrespect for our Prime Minister, but if he claims to be a Christian I wish he would show more respect for God and his word, and at least try to interpret the Bible more sensibly and responsibly. His comments regarding what the Bible says about slavery and homosexuality are at best very naive...

Kevin Rudd's reasoning was sound if he wanted to say things that many people like to hear, and that are in step with a non-Christian way of looking at things. But I think it would be very difficult to intelligently show how his words could really be consistent with what Christ intended (or his apostle Paul etc).

Not sure how to put this briefly. The PM's logic seems to be this:

1. Slavery is not a bad condition in the Bible.
2. Now we have advanced in Christian love to a changed view, understanding slavery is actually bad.
3. Homosexuality is a bad condition in the Bible.
4. Now we have advanced in Christian love to a changed view, understanding homosexuality is actually not a bad condition.
5. In both cases they follow the same pattern, and this is consistent with the central trajectory of the Gospel.

Non sequitur, Mr Rudd. Here a just a few of the problems with this logic:

1. In OT and NT freedom from slavery is one of the main motifs used, saying that slavery is a bad condition
2. As above, fighting against human slavery is actually consistent with what is seen throughout the Bible, not a surprising advance or change.
3. Homosexuality is not portrayed as a good condition in the Bible.
4. Nothing anticipates a future acceptance of homosexuality as being consistent with Bible teaching
5. The Bible does consistently teach freedom from both slavery and homosexuality as consistent with the central trajectory of the Gospel, which is about rescue by Jesus to free us from bad conditions so that we can truly and freely love others.

I think if one was to read through all the references to both slavery and homosexuality in all the Bible, and properly consider what each one says in context, I can't see how Mr Rudd's logic could honestly be justified as consistent with the Bible.

If the PM was merely making a naturalistic case concluding that homosexuality is just as valid as heterosexuality etc, ignoring the Bible, then what he said has some internal consistency and logic. My problem with Mr Rudd is that he didn't do that. He tried to say that his view was consistent with Christian teaching, aka the Bible. It makes no sense to say something is Christian which ignores or rejects the Bible. The Bible defines Christianity. It is like saying something is Moslem which ignores or rejects the Quran. Or saying something is socialist which really espouses capitalism. Or like the "atheist" I once met at a uni Atheist Society, who later told me he was really a pantheist. Etc.

And by the way, the Bible doesn't give "natural condition" as an "out" for immorality etc. The Bible also talks about people who have a tendency to be abusive and hot-tempered (or we could pick any number of other things). But the Gospel is about the possibility of being freed from such "natural conditions", and being forgiven and empowered to make a clean start. It really is good news :D

Okay, that wasn't brief. Oops!